QED Science vs Terminus
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
QED Science compared with Terminus
| Detail | 
QED Science | 
Terminus |
|---|
| What it does | Critical Thinking AI for constructive criticism and science evaluation
| Infrastructure to build and run apps, agents, skills and services
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | IL
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Core claim extraction and validation
- Grant proposal evaluation
- Personalized research insights feed
- Validity scoring and contradiction resolution
- SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance
- Data privacy with no model training on submissions
| - CLI for local development and deployment
- Apps with offline-capable records that sync across devices
- Long-running agents working 24/7
- Reusable skills that work across platforms
- Hosted and external services integration
- Free hosting
- Local testing with terminus dev simulator
- Background jobs, schedules and webhooks
- Support for TypeScript, Rust, Python, Go, C and C++ services
- Shared spaces for team collaboration
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Only AI platform trained on feedback from thousands of domain experts including Nobel laureates
- User manuscripts never used for model training or fine-tuning
- Provides nature-reviewer-level feedback at scale
- Built by scientists for scientists
| - Lego-style composable components that connect together
- Free hosting forever for all creations
- Unified workflow from local development to published releases
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 35 ▲ +2 (up) since last check | 3 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 29 | 5 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 26 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 157 | 4 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to QED Science More alternatives to Terminus