QED Science vs Perseus Computing
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
QED Science compared with Perseus Computing
| Detail | 
QED Science | 
Perseus Computing |
|---|
| What it does | Critical Thinking AI for constructive criticism and science evaluation
| High-assurance infrastructure for AI agents
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | IL
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Core claim extraction and validation
- Grant proposal evaluation
- Personalized research insights feed
- Validity scoring and contradiction resolution
- SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance
- Data privacy with no model training on submissions
| - Harpe: chooses what an AI agent reads under a token budget with consistent results
- Kibisis: keeps agent memory on your hardware with AES-256-GCM encryption
- Argus: append-only record that detects edits with cryptographic verification
- No network code by default for local and disconnected use
- MIT License with published code, benchmarks and raw results
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Only AI platform trained on feedback from thousands of domain experts including Nobel laureates
- User manuscripts never used for model training or fine-tuning
- Provides nature-reviewer-level feedback at scale
- Built by scientists for scientists
| - Measured empirical validation across 6,111 questions outperforming full-context models
- Zero plaintext on disk with encrypted vaults matching plaintext accuracy
- 78.3% fewer tokens sent to the model with a 1,200-token budget per turn
- Preserves conversational chronology and relational qualifiers under token budgets
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 35 ▲ +2 (up) since last check | 42 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 29 | 3 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 24 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 157 | 62 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to QED Science More alternatives to Perseus Computing