QED Science vs Mirio
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
QED Science compared with Mirio
| Detail | 
QED Science | 
Mirio |
|---|
| What it does | Critical Thinking AI for constructive criticism and science evaluation
| Inbound forms for coding agents
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| MVP
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | IL
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Free during beta: up to 1,000 responses per month
|
|---|
| Key features | - Core claim extraction and validation
- Grant proposal evaluation
- Personalized research insights feed
- Validity scoring and contradiction resolution
- SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance
- Data privacy with no model training on submissions
| - Customizable React form components
- Spam filtering and response screening
- Company enrichment for each response
- Multi-step forms that save progress
- Send to Slack, email, webhooks or Postgres
- Response versioning
- Read responses from terminal
- Fit scoring for leads
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Only AI platform trained on feedback from thousands of domain experts including Nobel laureates
- User manuscripts never used for model training or fine-tuning
- Provides nature-reviewer-level feedback at scale
- Built by scientists for scientists
| - Built for coding agents to set up and modify like code files
- Open source npm package under MIT license
- Forms live in your site's code, not separate tools
- Automatic company enrichment on every response
- No workflow switching needed
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 35 ▲ +2 (up) since last check | 1 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 29 | 4 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 4 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 157 | 1 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to QED Science More alternatives to Mirio