QED Science vs Leadsets
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
QED Science compared with Leadsets
| Detail | 
QED Science | 
Leadsets |
|---|
| What it does | Critical Thinking AI for constructive criticism and science evaluation
| Not given
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | IL
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Core claim extraction and validation
- Grant proposal evaluation
- Personalized research insights feed
- Validity scoring and contradiction resolution
- SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance
- Data privacy with no model training on submissions
| - Search people by title, function, seniority, location, company size, tech and industry
- Search and enrich companies by domain, headcount, industry, tech stack and hiring signals
- Scrape careers pages and company homepages for open roles, products and pricing
- Match reasons and freshness dates on every record
- Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and any MCP client
- REST API with TypeScript and Python SDKs
- Field-level checked_at and verified_at dates
- Source and data-rights metadata on every field
- Free SKILL.md playbooks for GTM workflows
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Only AI platform trained on feedback from thousands of domain experts including Nobel laureates
- User manuscripts never used for model training or fine-tuning
- Provides nature-reviewer-level feedback at scale
- Built by scientists for scientists
| - Flat monthly pricing with no per-record charges or credits
- Fair-use limits visible in every API response, not hidden behind a dashboard
- Records count only when data is returned, empty searches use no records
- First useful result in under five minutes, no lengthy onboarding
- Opt-out honored and suppression data managed by the company
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 35 ▲ +2 (up) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 29 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 157 | 0 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to QED Science More alternatives to Leadsets