QED Science vs Knotr
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
QED Science compared with Knotr
| Detail | 
QED Science | K
Knotr |
|---|
| What it does | Critical Thinking AI for constructive criticism and science evaluation
| Your voice and skills in every AI tool you use
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Startup
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | IL
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Free: 1 Profile, 10 Skills, 50 Documents, 10 Artifacts, 1 Style Guide from Starter Pack, 100 Hosted Chat AI credits/month. Pro: $24/mo or $20/mo billed annually, 5 Profiles, 75 Skills, 500 Documents, 75 Artifacts, 1 Style Guide, 1,000 Hosted Chat AI credits/month. Max: $49/mo or $40/mo billed annual
|
|---|
| Key features | - Core claim extraction and validation
- Grant proposal evaluation
- Personalized research insights feed
- Validity scoring and contradiction resolution
- SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance
- Data privacy with no model training on submissions
| - Profiles to define voice, tone, and judgment
- Style Guides to enforce writing rules
- Knowledgebases to store trusted documents and notes
- Skills to package repeatable workflows
- Artifacts for versioned, shareable outputs
- Hosted Chat with custom runtime
- MCP integration with external tools
- Team workspaces with shared knowledge
- Skill Catalog for discovery and import
- Collections to group and present artifacts
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Only AI platform trained on feedback from thousands of domain experts including Nobel laureates
- User manuscripts never used for model training or fine-tuning
- Provides nature-reviewer-level feedback at scale
- Built by scientists for scientists
| - Output sounds like you, not generic AI, because every tool reads the same profiles and style guides
- Stop re-uploading docs and rewriting instructions for each new tool
- Individual voice, shared standards on teams
- Built-in changelogs instead of Git for managing skills
- Works with any MCP-compatible AI client without vendor lock-in
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 35 ▲ +2 (up) since last check | 2 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 29 | 4 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 25 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 157 | 27 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to QED Science More alternatives to Knotr