QED Science vs iLang Inc.
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
QED Science compared with iLang Inc.
| Detail | 
QED Science | 
iLang Inc. |
|---|
| What it does | Critical Thinking AI for constructive criticism and science evaluation
| The native language of AI; in human terms, a protocol.
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Startup
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| 2026
|
|---|
| Based in | IL
| CA
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Core claim extraction and validation
- Grant proposal evaluation
- Personalized research insights feed
- Validity scoring and contradiction resolution
- SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance
- Data privacy with no model training on submissions
| - AI-native communication protocol with 88 verbs and two syntaxes
- AI See: give any AI model vision by pasting i.ilang.ai URLs
- Zero installation required, pure text format
- Works across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen and other models
- Loader available via pip and npm for automatic protocol injection
- Prompt compression: 67% reduction in tokens for typical instructions
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Only AI platform trained on feedback from thousands of domain experts including Nobel laureates
- User manuscripts never used for model training or fine-tuning
- Provides nature-reviewer-level feedback at scale
- Built by scientists for scientists
| - First protocol to formally map Greek mathematical symbols as primitive verbs for AI-to-AI communication
- Computable vector space for AI judgment using 11 dimensions and fuzzy mathematics instead of binary classification
- Open source and MIT licensed with no royalties or approval required
- Operates at the instruction and behavioral layer, complementary to MCP and A2A protocols
- Tested and benchmarked with public conformance results and DOI-registered research
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 35 ▲ +2 (up) since last check | 38 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 29 | 7 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 27 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 157 | 66 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to QED Science More alternatives to iLang Inc.