QED Science vs Harny
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
QED Science compared with Harny
| Detail | 
QED Science | 
Harny |
|---|
| What it does | Critical Thinking AI for constructive criticism and science evaluation
| Agent harness infrastructure that gives AI agents memory for each user, connected accounts, action limits and an audit record.
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | IL
| CA
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Free: first 500 monthly-active end users per month, free forever. Paid: $0.30 per monthly-active end user above 500, billed monthly.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Core claim extraction and validation
- Grant proposal evaluation
- Personalized research insights feed
- Validity scoring and contradiction resolution
- SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance
- Data privacy with no model training on submissions
| - Timestamped memory ingestion with backdating capability
- Per-user data isolation and privacy scoping
- Ranked memory recall with dated evidence
- Connected accounts integration per user
- Long-running agent jobs with folder-level operations
- Configurable token ceiling per API call
- Enforced action limits on agent operations
- Complete action audit trail with hash chaining
- MCP server integration for Claude and other clients
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Only AI platform trained on feedback from thousands of domain experts including Nobel laureates
- User manuscripts never used for model training or fine-tuning
- Provides nature-reviewer-level feedback at scale
- Built by scientists for scientists
| - Highest published BEAM benchmark score at 128K tokens: 85.1, compared to competing memory systems
- 98% fewer tokens required than raw tool output, making responses 4× cheaper
- Works with 20+ agent frameworks including LangChain, LangGraph and LlamaIndex
- First 500 monthly-active end users free forever
- Per-person billing model scales with user growth, not API calls
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 35 ▲ +2 (up) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 29 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 157 | 1 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to QED Science More alternatives to Harny