QED Science vs digithings

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

QED Science compared with digithings
Detail	QED Science	digithings
What it does	Critical Thinking AI for constructive criticism and science evaluation	Open-source AI infrastructure you self-host on your own hardware with your own keys
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	IL	Not given
Pricing model	Freemium	Open source
Pricing	Not given	Self-host: $0 (open source, MIT-licensed). Service and Enterprise tiers available on contact for integration and custom development work.
Key features	Core claim extraction and validation Grant proposal evaluation Personalized research insights feed Validity scoring and contradiction resolution SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance Data privacy with no model training on submissions	Provider routing with LiteLLM
What makes it different	Only AI platform trained on feedback from thousands of domain experts including Nobel laureates User manuscripts never used for model training or fine-tuning Provides nature-reviewer-level feedback at scale Built by scientists for scientists	Complete ownership: your keys, hardware, data and audit logs stay under your control No vendor lock-in: compose individual modules with your existing stack rather than replacing it Full transparency: MIT-licensed, publicly developed on GitHub with open issues, PRs and commit history Every request traceable: one ID threads through all services with full audit logging
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	35 +2 (up) since last check	5 −4 (down) since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	29	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	25	13
Referring domains (Majestic)	157	1

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to QED Science More alternatives to digithings