QED Science vs CogniCore
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
QED Science compared with CogniCore
| Detail | 
QED Science | 
CogniCore |
|---|
| What it does | Critical Thinking AI for constructive criticism and science evaluation
| Memory that follows you between AI apps
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | IL
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Core claim extraction and validation
- Grant proposal evaluation
- Personalized research insights feed
- Validity scoring and contradiction resolution
- SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance
- Data privacy with no model training on submissions
| - Connect to Claude via custom connector in Settings
- Add to ChatGPT with developer mode
- Automatic session save for Claude Code and Codex
- Save and resume sessions with brief summaries
- GitHub sign-in for private separate memory
- Delete individual memories or all data by email
- Zero model calls to save a session
- Session brief generated in ~450 tokens
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Only AI platform trained on feedback from thousands of domain experts including Nobel laureates
- User manuscripts never used for model training or fine-tuning
- Provides nature-reviewer-level feedback at scale
- Built by scientists for scientists
| - Shared memory across multiple AI apps and agents, not confined to one app
- Setup in about one minute with no credit card or waitlist
- Open source code so users can verify data handling
- No data selling, ads or use for AI model training
- Private per-account database with no cross-account access
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 35 ▲ +2 (up) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 29 | 1 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 10 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 157 | 12 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to QED Science More alternatives to CogniCore