MyA11yReport MCP vs Ryph
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
MyA11yReport MCP compared with Ryph
| Detail | MM
MyA11yReport MCP | 
Ryph |
|---|
| What it does | Accessibility auditing tools for AI agents
| Open-source AI agent orchestration platform for incident response and automation
|
|---|
| Stage | MVP
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | CA
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Axe-core automated accessibility scans with violation counts and per-rule details
- Page structure review including landmarks, headings and nested lists
- Tab and focus order analysis with tabindex flag detection
- Image and alt text inventory
- WCAG 2.2 color contrast checking
- Browser control for navigating dynamic content
- Session-based auditing with action logging
- Integration with Claude, opencode and other MCP clients
- Local execution with no data transmission
| - Incident response with agent investigation and pull request generation
- Automated workflows triggered on schedules or webhooks
- Agent summoning from GitHub, GitLab and Radicle with /ryph command
- Semantic memory system for shared and persistent agent learning
- Credentials kept behind gateways with no access in sandbox
- Customized environments per repository with cached dependencies
- Browser use for agent interactions with live watching
- Artifacts and pages for reports and overviews
- Deployment options from laptop to Kubernetes
- Tool proxy with allowlisted MCP server integrations
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Runs locally on your machine without requiring an account or API key
- Works with any MCP client including Claude Desktop and opencode
- Provides comprehensive accessibility auditing through axe-core integration
- Includes explicit audit workflow guidance for consistent evaluation
- Drives a real Chromium browser for accurate testing of dynamic content
| - Agents work without holding real credentials or keys
- Changes ship as patches that require review before merge
- Runs on your own infrastructure from laptop to cloud
- Semantic memory learns across runs with deduplication and contradiction handling
- Built-in safety assuming agents can be manipulated or exploited
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 1 ● no change since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 3 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 26 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 34 | 0 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to MyA11yReport MCP More alternatives to Ryph