Luma vs Tokgan
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | Tokgan | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | AI agents for creative work that generate, understand, and operate in the physical world | Human-editable AI rotoscoping for visual effects production |
| Stage | Established | Not given |
| Founded | 2021 | Not given |
| Based in | US | AU |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid |
| Pricing | Individual plans: Plus $30/month ($300/year) with 10,000 credits, Pro $90/month ($900/year) with 40,000 credits, Ultra $300/month ($3,000/year) with 150,000 credits. Business plans available with team management, SSO, and analytics. Video generation costs range from 20 credits/5 sec at 360p to 1200 | Token-based SaaS model with pre-purchased credits consumed per job, scaled to computation complexity. On-premise deployment available for confidentiality-bound studios. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 80 no change since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 27 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 51 | 13 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 12139 | 2 |
6 details filled in for both companies.