Google Search Console MCP vs Cogni
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Google Search Console MCP compared with Cogni
| Detail | 
Google Search Console MCP | C
Cogni |
|---|
| What it does | Ask Search Console in plain language from Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or Claude Code
| Memory that reasons
|
|---|
| Stage | Growing
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free with no credit card required, no trial limits, and no paywall features.
| Free plan at $0 USD; Pro plan at $5 USD per month.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Read Search Console data in plain language
- Site overview with clicks, impressions, CTR and average position
- Find ranking opportunities for queries ranking 5-20
- Detect keyword cannibalization across pages
- Analyze branded vs non-branded search traffic
- Inspect URL indexing status and crawl data
- View submitted sitemaps and their errors
- Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and other MCP clients
- Encrypted token storage and hash-based link revocation
| - Entity-graph spreading activation for cross-vocabulary retrieval
- Works with any LLM model
- No LLM or GPU in retrieval path
- Point-in-time and windowed recall
- Timestamped memories
- Fixed recall cost as memory grows
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No Google Cloud project or credentials.json required to set up
- Completely free with no card, trial limits, or locked features
- Read-only access prevents any modifications to Search Console data
- Works with any MCP client that supports remote servers
| - Reaches answers across unrelated documents that share no keywords, where vector search scores zero
- Deterministic retrieval with no model in the path, so results never vary between queries
- Constant per-query cost regardless of memory size, even at 32,000 words
- No infrastructure to run—no vector database, cluster, or GPU needed
- Works with any model, so small local models gain the most from better retrieval
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 29 ▼ −1 (down) since last check | 4 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 2 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 30 | 21 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 22 | 34 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Google Search Console MCP More alternatives to Cogni