withHuman vs Elpis
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
withHuman compared with Elpis
| Detail |
withHuman |
Elpis |
| What it does | The approval layer for AI agents
| Portable context for terminal coding agents
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | Open Source: free and self-hosted. Free: $0/month hosted plan with up to 5 members. Scale: $20 per user per month. Enterprise: Custom annual contract.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Tool call interception for all agent frameworks
- Automatic approval rules to prevent fatigue
- AI judge for complex rule evaluation
- Works with LangGraph, CrewAI, Mastra, Claude Agent SDK and more
- Open Agent Approval Protocol for framework independence
- Self-hosted or cloud-hosted deployment options
- Custom permission policies and organization controls
| - Context Ledger for curating admitted instructions, files and memory
- Deterministic context admission before model processing
- Workflows with Mother agent team design and checking
- Love Spot drawing board with Matilda companion
- Desktop app with theme customization
- Support for GPT, Claude and Gemini models
- Terminal and desktop app sharing state
- Portable context for terminal coding agents
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Framework-agnostic: works with any AI agent through the open Agent Approval Protocol
- No vendor lock-in: open source spec and SDKs let you swap providers without rewriting agents
- Comprehensive audit trail for accountability and compliance
- Meets reviewers where they work with multi-platform notifications
- Policy-based routing to eliminate approval bottlenecks
| - Deterministic context admission ensures agents see processed context before model receives it
- Context Ledger provides transparent curation of agent inputs
- Mother agent orchestrates multi-agent workflows with checking and merged results
- Collaborative drawing interface with AI companion
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 30 ▼ −1 (down) since last check | 7 ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 6 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 28 | 12 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 48 | 6 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to withHuman More alternatives to Elpis