withHuman vs BadMars
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
withHuman compared with BadMars
| Detail |
withHuman |
BadMars |
| What it does | The approval layer for AI agents
| Fail here first.
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Startup
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| 2026
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| RO
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Open Source: free and self-hosted. Free: $0/month hosted plan with up to 5 members. Scale: $20 per user per month. Enterprise: Custom annual contract.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Tool call interception for all agent frameworks
- Automatic approval rules to prevent fatigue
- AI judge for complex rule evaluation
- Works with LangGraph, CrewAI, Mastra, Claude Agent SDK and more
- Open Agent Approval Protocol for framework independence
- Self-hosted or cloud-hosted deployment options
- Custom permission policies and organization controls
| - Panel of 12 hostile specialists trained to find different failure modes
- Verbatim anchoring of every finding to your document
- Score computed by formula based on failure severity and probability
- The Frog: identification of the one critical problem to fix first
- Debrief debate feature to argue back with evidence
- Available in Claude and ChatGPT
- Android app for mobile access
- Program tracking across multiple missions and frog history
- 48-hour full refund guarantee on first Landing
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Framework-agnostic: works with any AI agent through the open Agent Approval Protocol
- No vendor lock-in: open source spec and SDKs let you swap providers without rewriting agents
- Comprehensive audit trail for accountability and compliance
- Meets reviewers where they work with multi-platform notifications
- Policy-based routing to eliminate approval bottlenecks
| - Ranked findings with concrete next steps, not opinions
- Start free, upgrade after seeing results
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 30 ▼ −1 (down) since last check | 7 ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 6 | 2 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 28 | 15 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 48 | 5 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to withHuman More alternatives to BadMars