Unibase vs Giraffe
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Unibase compared with Giraffe
| Detail |
Unibase |
Giraffe |
| What it does | One memory across all your AI
| Keep what you figure out with AI
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Works with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Kimi, and DeepSeek
- Chrome extension for easy integration
- Private and encrypted
- Persistent memory layer for AI agents
| - Save conclusions from AI conversations to projects
- Organize information into Current, Decisions, Open questions and Notes
- Track what changed and who changed it with full history
- Full-text search across all projects
- Export projects as Markdown and JSON
- Copy entire project to clipboard for use elsewhere
- No password sign-in with email codes
- Download account data on demand
- Create and edit projects entirely in browser
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Single memory across multiple AI systems
- Selective context sharing to any AI
- Open agent internet infrastructure
| - Read conclusions without asking the AI again
- Never overwrites old values, keeps complete history
- Works independently of any single AI assistant
- No syntax or complex interface to learn
- Free with no card required
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 41 ▼ −1 (down) since last check | 34 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 24 | 2 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 37 | 23 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 419 | 17 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Unibase More alternatives to Giraffe