Unibase vs Athmex
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Unibase compared with Athmex
| Detail |
Unibase |
Athmex |
| What it does | One memory across all your AI
| Turn ChatGPT or Claude into your AI coach
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Startup
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| GB
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Free trial
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| 14-day free trial, then €5.99/month or €59.99/year (2 months free on annual).
|
|---|
| Key features | - Works with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Kimi, and DeepSeek
- Chrome extension for easy integration
- Private and encrypted
- Persistent memory layer for AI agents
| - Store goals, PBs, races, thresholds and constraints in one athlete profile
- Connect to ChatGPT or Claude to bring athlete context into every conversation
- Update your profile and have ChatGPT or Claude update Athmex automatically
- Store injury history and training constraints
- Record equipment and shoes
- Track PBs and thresholds with dates
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Single memory across multiple AI systems
- Selective context sharing to any AI
- Open agent internet infrastructure
| - No need to re-explain your fitness and goals in every conversation
- Works with the AI assistants you already use
- Reliable athlete memory that you control and can correct
- Does not store activity history, only athlete context
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 41 ▼ −1 (down) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 24 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 37 | 20 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 419 | 4 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Unibase More alternatives to Athmex