Toqan vs MyA11yReport MCP
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Toqan compared with MyA11yReport MCP
| Detail |
Toqan | MM
MyA11yReport MCP |
| What it does | Your AI workspace
| Accessibility auditing tools for AI agents
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| MVP
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | NL
| CA
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Build apps and dashboards from prompts without coding
- Integrates with Slack, Google Drive, Gmail, Notion, and custom data via MCP and OAuth
- Maintains context and picks up where you left off
- Runs tasks on a schedule automatically
- Search and analyze data from PDFs, Google Drive, and Sheets in plain language
- Built on enterprise-grade infrastructure with GDPR compliance
- No onboarding or configuration required
- Send scheduled Slack alerts and digests
| - Axe-core automated accessibility scans with violation counts and per-rule details
- Page structure review including landmarks, headings and nested lists
- Tab and focus order analysis with tabindex flag detection
- Image and alt text inventory
- WCAG 2.2 color contrast checking
- Browser control for navigating dynamic content
- Session-based auditing with action logging
- Integration with Claude, opencode and other MCP clients
- Local execution with no data transmission
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No setup or configuration needed to start using
- Remembers context and continues work without recaps
- Learns tasks and runs them automatically on a schedule
- Built by Prosus, one of the world's largest technology groups
| - Runs locally on your machine without requiring an account or API key
- Works with any MCP client including Claude Desktop and opencode
- Provides comprehensive accessibility auditing through axe-core integration
- Includes explicit audit workflow guidance for consistent evaluation
- Drives a real Chromium browser for accurate testing of dynamic content
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 32 ▼ −1 (down) since last check | 1 ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 24 | 3 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 32 | 26 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 145 | 34 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Toqan More alternatives to MyA11yReport MCP