Tokgan vs sync.
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | Tokgan | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Human-editable AI rotoscoping for visual effects production | AI lip sync, dubbing and talking video for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and other agents |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | AU | Not given |
| Pricing model | Paid | Freemium |
| Pricing | Token-based SaaS model with pre-purchased credits consumed per job, scaled to computation complexity. On-premise deployment available for confidentiality-bound studios. | Free tier: 3 free video generations per month (up to 15 seconds each), 10 monthly audio generations. Paid plans on legacy usage billing: Hobbyist ($6 invoice threshold, $0.04-$0.05/sec lipsync-2), Creator ($20 threshold, $0.067-$0.083/sec lipsync-2-pro), Growth ($50 threshold), Scale ($250 threshold |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet no change since last check | 67 +1 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 12 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 13 | 42 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 2 | 1145 |
5 details filled in for both companies.