TokenGO vs RouteMux
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Self-operated inference API for open-weight LLMs and video models | One API for hundreds of AI models with unified billing and refundable balance |
| Stage | Not given | Startup |
| Founded | Not given | 2026 |
| Based in | US | Not given |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Pricing | Standard (pay-as-you-go, under $1K/month): List price with unified API, cost monitoring, usage limits, unlimited seats. Growth ($1K-$15K/month): 20% volume discount, quarterly billing, priority support, SLA. Scale ($15K-$40K/month): 30% volume discount, dedicated support, DPA. Custom ($40K+/month): | Usage-based prepaid credits with transparent per-token pricing. Examples: GPT-6.1 Terra from $0.15 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens; Claude Haiku 5.5 from $0.03/M input / $0.12/M output; Claude Opus 5.5 from $1.12/M input / $5.6/M output. First top-up receives 10% bonus credits (up to $200, minimu |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 17 no change since last check | 23 +1 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 4 | 4 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 27 | 29 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 77 | 16 |
5 details filled in for both companies.