Token Security vs Exabase
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Token Security compared with Exabase
| Detail |
Token Security |
Exabase |
| What it does | AI Agent and Non-Human Identity Security Platform
| Context infrastructure for AI agents
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Startup
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| GB
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - AI Agent and MCP Server Discovery
- Over 1,000 Built-In Integrations
- Intent-Based Permissioning
- Identity Threat Detection and Response
- Lifecycle Management
- Accountability and Traceability
- Compliance and Auditability
- Security Posture Management
- AI-Driven Automation and Remediation
- Token MCP Server
| - Memory system with self-managing advanced memory
- Isolated per-tenant instances with version rollback
- Portable context server with files, notes and links
- Sub-document multi-modal hybrid search
- Structured data extraction from PDFs, websites and images
- Autonomous agents for knowledge base automation
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- AES-256 encryption at rest and SSL in transit
- TypeScript SDK and REST API
- Model-agnostic and framework-agnostic
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Identity-first approach built for AI agents, not human-centric tools
- Unified identity graph correlating agents, humans, secrets, permissions, and data
- Intent-aware least-privilege enforcement across agent lifecycle
- Deep continuous discovery across on-prem, hybrid, and cloud environments
- Native AI capabilities with Token MCP Server and AI Agent
| - Cut token spend by up to 81% through persistent agent memory instead of full context window stuffing
- State-of-the-art on two leading AI memory benchmarks
- Full-stack data layer eliminating need for multiple services
- Production-tested at scale powering Fabric platform
- Self-improving memory that tracks relationships and resolves contradictions
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 63 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 29 ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 11 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 44 | 32 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 680 | 122 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Token Security More alternatives to Exabase