Skip to main content
NexoraLaunch home

Build log live

Tensorant vs Wirkung

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Tensorant compared with Wirkung
DetailTensorant logo TensorantWirkung logo Wirkung
What it doesFine-tune and serve open-weight models on your own cloud GPUs without managing ML infrastructure Everything has an algorithm
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given Not given
Pricing modelFreemium Not given
PricingFree: $0 (1 training run per month, 1 model deployment, 1 member); Starter: $49/month (5 training runs per month, 5 model deployments, 1 member); Pro: $199/month (unlimited training runs, 1,000 model deployments, 10 included members, $30/month for each extra seat); Enterprise: custom pricing. Free i Not given
Key features
  • Train models with SFT, DPO, or RL using LoRA or QLoRA
  • Monitor training with real-time loss, time and cost tracking
  • Evaluate models by comparing base and tuned performance
  • Serve models as OpenAI-compatible API or wake-on-demand
  • Support for vision models including Gemma 4 and Qwen3.8
  • DPO preference learning from paired answers
  • Run budget-controlled experiments with hour and price limits
  • Download adapters as standard LoRA files or publish to Hugging Face
  • Constant-state attention: models serve any context length from the same memory per request
  • HCGM: models run from disk storage instead of memory
  • M-Rail: context processed by a model can be reused instantly in future requests
  • CPUDA/sGPU: run unmodified CUDA programs on CPUs with bit-identical results
  • Organ grafting: transfer capabilities between models without training
  • Personal instruction set (ISA) compiled on device from phone signals
  • Population ISA: compile laws from many people without personal records
  • Digital twins of customers, fleets, cities or markets
  • Results identical across all machines and architectures
  • Computation cost follows novelty not data size
What makes it different
  • No training scripts required; workflow runs in console, CLI or via AI agent
  • GPU costs billed by your provider with zero markup from Tensorant
  • Data stays in your own storage; Tensorant keeps only workflow records
  • Free plan covers complete workflow on one model from import to API
  • Models are downloadable and portable to other platforms
  • Constant memory cost regardless of context length or data size
  • Exact reuse: every computed result is kept and reused instantly
  • Portable execution with bit-identical results across all hardware
  • Models run from storage without retraining or fitting in memory
  • Privacy-preserving: raw data never leaves the device
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)Not checked yet no change since last checkNot checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)00
Citation Flow (Majestic)160
Referring domains (Majestic)30

3 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Tensorant More alternatives to Wirkung

Ask a question