SiftServe vs Rayrun

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

SiftServe compared with Rayrun
Detail	SiftServe	Rayrun
What it does	Web infrastructure that translates your site into an AI-readable version approved by you and served to agents at the edge	One endpoint for every MCP tool
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	AE	US
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Pricing	Free eight-week pilot including onboarding and model costs. Three paid plans after pilot: Pay as you go (self-serve, usage-based), Subscription (self-serve, monthly or annual flat fee), and Managed (done by company, pricing quoted per site). All plans quoted per individual site based on page count,	Free for one developer with up to 25 source-built services, 50,000 tool calls a month, then $0.20 per thousand. Team plan is $25 per developer per month with 100,000 tool calls per developer a month, pooled, then $0.20 per thousand. Enterprise from $1,500 per month.
Key features	AI agent rebuilds pages into semantic HTML, FAQs, and structured data Vision pass captures facts locked inside images Sifted pages use roughly 90% fewer tokens than originals Served from edge, humans and search crawlers see original site unchanged Before-and-after audit score for every page Measures citations and AI referrals from sifted pages	Source-built servers with TypeScript or Python projects Remote MCP, OpenAPI, npm package, and container image support Per-tool and per-argument access control policies Tool definition review and approval workflow Content scanning with literal and regex detectors Activity tracking and audit trails OIDC and SAML 2.0 single sign-on SCIM 2.0 provisioning Workspace-specific data encryption Custom domain publishing with DNS and Cloudflare certification
What makes it different	Only AI agents see sifted pages; humans and Google crawlers see original site unchanged Every claim traces 1:1 to original pages; AI never fabricates or adds content 90% fewer tokens per page while carrying 37% more readable content Human in the loop approval for every page before serving to agents Measures results with before-and-after comparison on your traffic	One endpoint replaces every client config, eliminating need for each client to store every server and secret Coding agent builds the server automatically with no adapter needed Credentials held once by Rayrun instead of distributed across clients Built-in security review with published controls and audit trails for compliance teams Support for multiple service types without writing adapters
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	22 +1 (up) since last check	45 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	9	12
Citation Flow (Majestic)	27	36
Referring domains (Majestic)	61	125

6 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to SiftServe More alternatives to Rayrun