runx vs withHuman
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
runx compared with withHuman
| Detail | 
runx | 
withHuman |
|---|
| What it does | Give your agent specialist skills for the work around your product
| The approval layer for AI agents
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Open Source: free and self-hosted. Free: $0/month hosted plan with up to 5 members. Scale: $20 per user per month. Enterprise: Custom annual contract.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Pre-built skills for business ops, organic growth, research and development
- Compose skills into repeatable workflows
- Signed receipts recording each run
- Run locally without account via open-source CLI
- Secure credential management through connectors
- Approval gates for spending and publishing actions
- Integration with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and other agents
- Connect to GitHub, Slack, Apollo, Linear, Notion, Sentry and more
| - Tool call interception for all agent frameworks
- Automatic approval rules to prevent fatigue
- AI judge for complex rule evaluation
- Works with LangGraph, CrewAI, Mastra, Claude Agent SDK and more
- Open Agent Approval Protocol for framework independence
- Self-hosted or cloud-hosted deployment options
- Custom permission policies and organization controls
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Runs skills locally on your machine via open-source CLI without requiring an account
- Keeps credentials secure in connectors so they never appear in skills or receipts
- Records every action in a signed receipt for full audit trail
- Write and combine your own skills into custom workflows
| - Framework-agnostic: works with any AI agent through the open Agent Approval Protocol
- No vendor lock-in: open source spec and SDKs let you swap providers without rewriting agents
- Comprehensive audit trail for accountability and compliance
- Meets reviewers where they work with multi-platform notifications
- Policy-based routing to eliminate approval bottlenecks
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 17 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 30 ▼ −1 (down) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 10 | 6 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 29 | 28 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 68 | 48 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to runx More alternatives to withHuman