runx vs BadMars
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
runx compared with BadMars
| Detail | 
runx | 
BadMars |
|---|
| What it does | Give your agent specialist skills for the work around your product
| Fail here first.
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Startup
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| 2026
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| RO
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Pre-built skills for business ops, organic growth, research and development
- Compose skills into repeatable workflows
- Signed receipts recording each run
- Run locally without account via open-source CLI
- Secure credential management through connectors
- Approval gates for spending and publishing actions
- Integration with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and other agents
- Connect to GitHub, Slack, Apollo, Linear, Notion, Sentry and more
| - Panel of 12 hostile specialists trained to find different failure modes
- Verbatim anchoring of every finding to your document
- Score computed by formula based on failure severity and probability
- The Frog: identification of the one critical problem to fix first
- Debrief debate feature to argue back with evidence
- Available in Claude and ChatGPT
- Android app for mobile access
- Program tracking across multiple missions and frog history
- 48-hour full refund guarantee on first Landing
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Runs skills locally on your machine via open-source CLI without requiring an account
- Keeps credentials secure in connectors so they never appear in skills or receipts
- Records every action in a signed receipt for full audit trail
- Write and combine your own skills into custom workflows
| - Ranked findings with concrete next steps, not opinions
- Start free, upgrade after seeing results
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 17 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 7 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 10 | 2 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 29 | 15 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 68 | 5 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to runx More alternatives to BadMars