RouteMux vs offrec
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | One API for hundreds of AI models with unified billing and refundable balance | Zero-retention inference for frontier models |
| Stage | Startup | Startup |
| Founded | 2026 | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | MX |
| Pricing model | Paid | Freemium |
| Pricing | Usage-based prepaid credits with transparent per-token pricing. Examples: GPT-6.1 Terra from $0.15 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens; Claude Haiku 5.5 from $0.03/M input / $0.12/M output; Claude Opus 5.5 from $1.12/M input / $5.6/M output. First top-up receives 10% bonus credits (up to $200, minimu | Pay as you go from $10. Monthly subscriptions: Run $19/month, Run Plus $99/month (5× allowance), Run Max $199/month (10× allowance). Model pricing per million tokens varies: qwen3.8-max $2.00 input/$6.00 output, claude-haiku-5-5 $0.10 input/$0.50 output, claude-sonnet-5 $2.00 input/$10.00 output, cl |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 23 +1 (up) since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 4 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 29 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 16 | 0 |
6 details filled in for both companies.