RouteMux vs Agentgates
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | One API for hundreds of AI models with unified billing and refundable balance | Confidential and open LLM inference for agents, paid per request in USDC |
| Stage | Startup | Not given |
| Founded | 2026 | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | US |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Pricing | Usage-based prepaid credits with transparent per-token pricing. Examples: GPT-6.1 Terra from $0.15 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens; Claude Haiku 5.5 from $0.03/M input / $0.12/M output; Claude Opus 5.5 from $1.12/M input / $5.6/M output. First top-up receives 10% bonus credits (up to $200, minimu | LLM inference: Models priced per million tokens input and output, ranging from $0.043 to $3.63 for input and $0.22 to $18.15 for output (e.g., Qwen3.8 27B route C: $0.043/$1.375, Kimi K3 route B: $3.63/$18.15). Virtual machines: Starter $0.159-$0.169/hour, Standard $0.318-$0.335/hour, Pro $0.636-$0. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 23 +1 (up) since last check | 27 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 4 | 1 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 29 | 29 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 16 | 70 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to RouteMux More alternatives to Agentgates