Replyz vs Haste Health

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Replyz compared with Haste Health
Detail	Replyz	Haste Health
What it does	Email for your AI agent	Open-source FHIR server for AI-native health apps
Stage	MVP	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	PT	Not given
Pricing model	Not given	Freemium
Pricing	Not given	Self-hosted: Free under Apache-2.0. Developer tier: $0/month (free hosted tenant, no credit card). Production: $1,500/month (signed BAA, 10,000,000 API points/day, 99.9% uptime SLA). Scale: From $6,000/month (50,000,000 API points/day, 99.95% uptime SLA).
Key features	Works with OpenClaw, Hermes, and Claude Code MCP, CLI, or skill integration options Automatic verification code and link extraction Agent email waiting capability Human approval required for outgoing emails	FHIR R4 REST API with full CRUD operations OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect authentication Model Context Protocol endpoints for AI agents Attribute-based access control with FHIRPath SQL on FHIR analytics views Custom operations in TypeScript Multi-tenant support TOTP MFA and hardened authentication SDKs for TypeScript, Rust and React
What makes it different	Inbox setup in 60 seconds No humans in the loop for email handling EU-hosted infrastructure Human approval before sending	Normalizes data from Epic, Oracle Health, HL7v2 and any FHIR server into one API No feature gates: same open-source code in self-hosted and hosted versions Production-ready compliance: signed BAA, SOC 2 roadmap, pre-answered security questionnaire
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	31 +31 (up) since last check	2 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	0	3
Citation Flow (Majestic)	0	22
Referring domains (Majestic)	0	13

3 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Replyz More alternatives to Haste Health