Replicate vs Knostic
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | Replicate | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Run and fine-tune models. Deploy custom models. All with one line of code. | Control plane for agentic AI security on the endpoint |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | US |
| Pricing model | Paid | Freemium |
| Pricing | Most models billed by time based on hardware used (CPU $0.000100/sec, T4 GPU $0.000225/sec, L40S GPU $0.000975/sec). Some models billed by input/output tokens or generated items. Private custom models billed for all uptime; fast-booting fine-tunes billed only for active processing. | Kirin: Free ($0/mo) for individual developers and small teams (1-5 users), Team plan at $15/mo per user for growing teams (5+ users), Enterprise plan with custom pricing. AgentMesh: Free ($0/mo) with 300 items per category, Premium at $15/mo per user, Pro at $850/mo per user for unlimited API access |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 83 no change since last check | 62 +1 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 45 | 16 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 61 | 40 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 11568 | 810 |
5 details filled in for both companies.