Replicate vs Agentik
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | Replicate | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Run and fine-tune models. Deploy custom models. All with one line of code. | Connect your agent to 2,400+ tools through one MCP connection at provider prices |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | FR |
| Pricing model | Paid | Not given |
| Pricing | Most models billed by time based on hardware used (CPU $0.000100/sec, T4 GPU $0.000225/sec, L40S GPU $0.000975/sec). Some models billed by input/output tokens or generated items. Private custom models billed for all uptime; fast-booting fine-tunes billed only for active processing. | Free tier with access to free tools and optional $5 promotional credit. Pay-as-you-go with no platform fee on first top-up of $10 or less; 5.5% platform fee (minimum $0.80) on larger first top-ups and subsequent top-ups. Tool calls charged at provider's price with 0% markup. Example prices: Google s |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 83 no change since last check | 37 −1 (down) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 45 | 27 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 61 | 33 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 11568 | 55 |
4 details filled in for both companies.