Recurse vs withHuman
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Recurse compared with withHuman
| Detail | 
Recurse | 
withHuman |
|---|
| What it does | Build and deploy Agent MCP Apps
| The approval layer for AI agents
|
|---|
| Stage | Growing
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Paid
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Open Source: free and self-hosted. Free: $0/month hosted plan with up to 5 members. Scale: $20 per user per month. Enterprise: Custom annual contract.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Run agents with Python tools
- Deploy agents as MCP servers
- Validate structured inputs and outputs
- Inspect run results and artifacts
- Secrets management
- 24-hour result retention
| - Tool call interception for all agent frameworks
- Automatic approval rules to prevent fatigue
- AI judge for complex rule evaluation
- Works with LangGraph, CrewAI, Mastra, Claude Agent SDK and more
- Open Agent Approval Protocol for framework independence
- Self-hosted or cloud-hosted deployment options
- Custom permission policies and organization controls
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No subscription or idle charges for usage-based pricing
- Zero markup on model tokens
- Hosting included with deployment
- Available through MCP clients like Claude and Codex
- Full visibility into agent execution and results
| - Framework-agnostic: works with any AI agent through the open Agent Approval Protocol
- No vendor lock-in: open source spec and SDKs let you swap providers without rewriting agents
- Comprehensive audit trail for accountability and compliance
- Meets reviewers where they work with multi-platform notifications
- Policy-based routing to eliminate approval bottlenecks
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 13 ▼ −21 (down) since last check | 30 ▼ −1 (down) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 11 | 6 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 28 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 39 | 48 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Recurse More alternatives to withHuman