Recurse vs SpinSponsor

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Recurse compared with SpinSponsor
Detail	Recurse	SpinSponsor
What it does	Build and deploy Agent MCP Apps	Earn 50% of ad revenue while Claude Code works
Stage	Growing	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	GB
Pricing model	Paid	Free
Pricing	Not given	Not given
Key features	Run agents with Python tools Deploy agents as MCP servers Validate structured inputs and outputs Inspect run results and artifacts Secrets management 24-hour result retention	Clearly labelled sponsored messages in Claude Code Pause and resume sponsorship with /ads commands Dashboard to track earnings and request payouts Never reads prompts, code or files Supports local terminal and Desktop Code sessions Link up to 3 machines per developer account Minimum £10 balance required for bank payouts via Stripe Earnings pending for at least 30 days before available
What makes it different	No subscription or idle charges for usage-based pricing Zero markup on model tokens Hosting included with deployment Available through MCP clients like Claude and Codex Full visibility into agent execution and results	Only monetization option for Claude Code developers that preserves privacy and code security Highest revenue share at 50% of advertiser spend No targeting based on code or prompts—completely privacy-first Fully optional and easy to pause at any time
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	13 −21 (down) since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	11	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	20	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	39	0

4 details filled in for both companies.