Recurse vs OpenRig
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Recurse compared with OpenRig
| Detail | 
Recurse | 
OpenRig |
|---|
| What it does | Build and deploy Agent MCP Apps
| A persistent team of coding agents
|
|---|
| Stage | Growing
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Paid
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Run agents with Python tools
- Deploy agents as MCP servers
- Validate structured inputs and outputs
- Inspect run results and artifacts
- Secrets management
- 24-hour result retention
| - Start teams with one command and manage agents across multiple machines
- Mix Claude Code, Codex and Pi agents in one team
- Agents delegate and coordinate work with named task assignments and queue ownership
- Agents message each other directly and read each other's screens
- Restore agent conversations after restart or reboot from snapshots
- Choose different models and reasoning effort per agent
- Bring custom harnesses and integrate with MCP servers and Claude Desktop
- Start Docker Compose services alongside agent teams
- Control message filtering with typing guards and chat broadcasts
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No subscription or idle charges for usage-based pricing
- Zero markup on model tokens
- Hosting included with deployment
- Available through MCP clients like Claude and Codex
- Full visibility into agent execution and results
| - One conversation interface with a lead agent coordinating specialists behind the scenes
- Mix multiple coding models and harnesses in one managed team
- Run entirely self-hosted on your own machine with no external coordination
- Open source with Apache 2.0 license and extensible harness contracts
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 13 ▼ −21 (down) since last check | 28 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 11 | 6 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 36 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 39 | 191 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Recurse More alternatives to OpenRig