Recurse vs Liyagent
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Recurse compared with Liyagent
| Detail | 
Recurse | 
Liyagent |
|---|
| What it does | Build and deploy Agent MCP Apps
| Governed AI agents for any system, pre-built for IT, HR, SAP, Salesforce and finance
|
|---|
| Stage | Growing
| Startup
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| 2026
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| IN
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Paid
| Contact for pricing
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Run agents with Python tools
- Deploy agents as MCP servers
- Validate structured inputs and outputs
- Inspect run results and artifacts
- Secrets management
- 24-hour result retention
| - Pre-built agents for IT service, HR, SAP, Salesforce and finance
- Approval-based control for all write operations
- Support for multiple AI models with fallback chains
- 50 built-in connectors plus MCP, OpenAPI, OData and SQL support
- Self-hosted or managed hosting options
- Per-agent and per-team spend budgets
- Rules-based argument validation with guardrails
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No subscription or idle charges for usage-based pricing
- Zero markup on model tokens
- Hosting included with deployment
- Available through MCP clients like Claude and Codex
- Full visibility into agent execution and results
| - Works within SAP's API Policy via direct APIs or SAP Integration Suite MCP gateway
- Every agent controlled by a single unified governance platform
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 13 ▼ −21 (down) since last check | 10 ▼ −15 (down) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 11 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 24 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 39 | 3 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Recurse More alternatives to Liyagent