Skip to main content
NexoraLaunch home

Build log live

Recurse vs Jev

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Recurse compared with Jev
DetailRecurse logo RecurseJev logo Jev
What it doesBuild and deploy Agent MCP Apps API access without the waitlist: one key, two endpoints
StageGrowing Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given Not given
Pricing modelPaid Freemium
PricingNot given Not given
Key features
  • Run agents with Python tools
  • Deploy agents as MCP servers
  • Validate structured inputs and outputs
  • Inspect run results and artifacts
  • Secrets management
  • 24-hour result retention
  • Custom criteria: POST state with choice options and score rubrics
  • Eight pre-measured rulesets: support-ticket-triage, llm-model-routing, agent-tool-selection, content-moderation, phishing-detection, rag-reranking, agent-output-guardrails, lead-scoring
  • Probability distributions over all choices and scores
  • Parallel question evaluation within one call
  • Key rotation and deletion
  • TypeSafe key support for direct billing
What makes it different
  • No subscription or idle charges for usage-based pricing
  • Zero markup on model tokens
  • Hosting included with deployment
  • Available through MCP clients like Claude and Codex
  • Full visibility into agent execution and results
  • No waitlist: get a key immediately with email or Google sign-in
  • Measured pricing: real calls cost ~20× less than vendor-circulated figures
  • Input-only pricing with no output tokens
  • Eight rulesets with published exact calls and measured output
  • Transparent cost reporting with versioned model IDs in responses
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)34 −1 (down) since last check17 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)1118
Citation Flow (Majestic)2024
Referring domains (Majestic)3980

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Recurse More alternatives to Jev

Ask a question