Recurse vs CometAPI

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Recurse compared with CometAPI
Detail	Recurse	CometAPI
What it does	Build and deploy Agent MCP Apps	One API Access 500+ AI Models
Stage	Growing	Growing
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	HK
Pricing model	usage-based	usage-based
Pricing	Not given	Per-token billing for text models and per-image/second for media models, with all models priced 20% below official provider rates. Free trial with test credits, no credit card required. Credits roll over indefinitely.
Key features	Run agents with Python tools Deploy agents as MCP servers Validate structured inputs and outputs Inspect run results and artifacts Secrets management 24-hour result retention	OpenAI-compatible API Unified billing and credentials Real-time usage analytics Budget alerts and cost control Model comparison tools Playground for testing Enterprise-grade security 99.9% service uptime Sub-400ms average latency
What makes it different	No subscription or idle charges for usage-based pricing Zero markup on model tokens Hosting included with deployment Available through MCP clients like Claude and Codex Full visibility into agent execution and results	20-40% lower pricing than direct provider rates Single API key replaces multiple vendor accounts Zero vendor lock-in with instant model switching No code refactoring required
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	35 no change since last check	61 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	11	22
Citation Flow (Majestic)	20	48
Referring domains (Majestic)	39	3913

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Recurse More alternatives to CometAPI