Recurse vs BadMars
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Recurse compared with BadMars
| Detail | 
Recurse | 
BadMars |
|---|
| What it does | Build and deploy Agent MCP Apps
| Fail here first.
|
|---|
| Stage | Growing
| Startup
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| 2026
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| RO
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Paid
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Run agents with Python tools
- Deploy agents as MCP servers
- Validate structured inputs and outputs
- Inspect run results and artifacts
- Secrets management
- 24-hour result retention
| - Panel of 12 hostile specialists trained to find different failure modes
- Verbatim anchoring of every finding to your document
- Score computed by formula based on failure severity and probability
- The Frog: identification of the one critical problem to fix first
- Debrief debate feature to argue back with evidence
- Available in Claude and ChatGPT
- Android app for mobile access
- Program tracking across multiple missions and frog history
- 48-hour full refund guarantee on first Landing
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No subscription or idle charges for usage-based pricing
- Zero markup on model tokens
- Hosting included with deployment
- Available through MCP clients like Claude and Codex
- Full visibility into agent execution and results
| - Ranked findings with concrete next steps, not opinions
- Start free, upgrade after seeing results
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 13 ▼ −21 (down) since last check | 7 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 11 | 2 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 15 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 39 | 5 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Recurse More alternatives to BadMars