Recalld vs Zipline

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Recalld compared with Zipline
Detail	Recalld	Zipline
What it does	The memory layer for AI Agents	One thread for every AI assistant you use
Stage	Growing	MVP
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	IE
Pricing model	Freemium	Free trial
Pricing	Not given	Not given
Key features	Long-term memory for AI agents Automatic fact extraction and reconciliation Curated recall retrieval Raw vector search capability Model Context Protocol integration Regional data residency End-to-end encryption Right to erasure Bring-your-own-key model support Recalld Chat assistant	TypeScript SDK MCP server integration
What makes it different	Curated recall uses 6.7× fewer tokens than raw search while maintaining accuracy Automatic fact updating and reconciliation without manual deduplication pipelines Verified on open benchmark maintained by independent company Native MCP server requiring no SDK or glue code GDPR-compliant by design with transparent data handling	Single conversation thread across multiple AI assistants Works in native AI assistant apps without switching Uses open standard MCP for integrations Automatic task pickup for Claude and Grok Full user control with pause and revoke options
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	7 −1 (down) since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	0	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	15	15
Referring domains (Majestic)	10	3

5 details filled in for both companies.