Rayrun vs Haste Health
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | One endpoint for every MCP tool | Open-source FHIR server for AI-native health apps |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | US | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free for one developer with up to 25 source-built services, 50,000 tool calls a month, then $0.20 per thousand. Team plan is $25 per developer per month with 100,000 tool calls per developer a month, pooled, then $0.20 per thousand. Enterprise from $1,500 per month. | Self-hosted: Free under Apache-2.0. Developer tier: $0/month (free hosted tenant, no credit card). Production: $1,500/month (signed BAA, 10,000,000 API points/day, 99.9% uptime SLA). Scale: From $6,000/month (50,000,000 API points/day, 99.95% uptime SLA). |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 45 no change since last check | 2 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 12 | 3 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 36 | 22 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 125 | 13 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Rayrun More alternatives to Haste Health