Orq.ai vs RouteMux
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | EU-built control plane for enterprise AI that governs every LLM and MCP call | One API for hundreds of AI models with unified billing and refundable balance |
| Stage | Not given | Startup |
| Founded | Not given | 2026 |
| Based in | NL | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid |
| Pricing | Pay-as-you-go: 1M free requests per month with BYOK (bring your own keys), then 4% fee; 4.5% fee on Orq.ai keys. Included monthly: 100k spans, 1 GB processed data, 500 agent runs, unlimited AI Gateway seats. AI Studio seats €35/seat/month. Spans €7 per 100k after included allowance. Processed data € | Usage-based prepaid credits with transparent per-token pricing. Examples: GPT-6.1 Terra from $0.15 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens; Claude Haiku 5.5 from $0.03/M input / $0.12/M output; Claude Opus 5.5 from $1.12/M input / $5.6/M output. First top-up receives 10% bonus credits (up to $200, minimu |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 54 no change since last check | 23 +1 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 13 | 4 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 41 | 29 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 791 | 16 |
5 details filled in for both companies.