MyA11yReport MCP vs Cogni
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
MyA11yReport MCP compared with Cogni
| Detail | MM
MyA11yReport MCP | C
Cogni |
|---|
| What it does | Accessibility auditing tools for AI agents
| Memory that reasons
|
|---|
| Stage | MVP
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | CA
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Free plan at $0 USD; Pro plan at $5 USD per month.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Axe-core automated accessibility scans with violation counts and per-rule details
- Page structure review including landmarks, headings and nested lists
- Tab and focus order analysis with tabindex flag detection
- Image and alt text inventory
- WCAG 2.2 color contrast checking
- Browser control for navigating dynamic content
- Session-based auditing with action logging
- Integration with Claude, opencode and other MCP clients
- Local execution with no data transmission
| - Entity-graph spreading activation for cross-vocabulary retrieval
- Works with any LLM model
- No LLM or GPU in retrieval path
- Point-in-time and windowed recall
- Timestamped memories
- Fixed recall cost as memory grows
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Runs locally on your machine without requiring an account or API key
- Works with any MCP client including Claude Desktop and opencode
- Provides comprehensive accessibility auditing through axe-core integration
- Includes explicit audit workflow guidance for consistent evaluation
- Drives a real Chromium browser for accurate testing of dynamic content
| - Reaches answers across unrelated documents that share no keywords, where vector search scores zero
- Deterministic retrieval with no model in the path, so results never vary between queries
- Constant per-query cost regardless of memory size, even at 32,000 words
- No infrastructure to run—no vector database, cluster, or GPU needed
- Works with any model, so small local models gain the most from better retrieval
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 1 ● no change since last check | 4 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 3 | 2 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 26 | 21 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 34 | 34 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to MyA11yReport MCP More alternatives to Cogni