Lusor vs Exabase
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Lusor compared with Exabase
| Detail | 
Lusor | 
Exabase |
|---|
| What it does | Run AI agents on real phones or control phones directly via API
| Context infrastructure for AI agents
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Startup
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| GB
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Send AI agents tasks in plain language to execute on phones
- Direct phone control with tap, type, swipe and app launch actions
- Support for iPhone, Android and cloud-based Lusor Phones
- Screen reading capability
- API with interactive playground
- Agent sessions and turn-based interaction
- Recordings and replay functionality
- Location and timezone control for phones
- Structured output from agent tasks
- Multi-model support for agents
| - Memory system with self-managing advanced memory
- Isolated per-tenant instances with version rollback
- Portable context server with files, notes and links
- Sub-document multi-modal hybrid search
- Structured data extraction from PDFs, websites and images
- Autonomous agents for knowledge base automation
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- AES-256 encryption at rest and SSL in transit
- TypeScript SDK and REST API
- Model-agnostic and framework-agnostic
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Provides real phones to AI agents for authentic task execution
- Supports both your own phones and managed cloud phones
- Complete screen interaction capabilities for automation
- Developer-focused with versioned API and JSON responses
| - Cut token spend by up to 81% through persistent agent memory instead of full context window stuffing
- State-of-the-art on two leading AI memory benchmarks
- Full-stack data layer eliminating need for multiple services
- Production-tested at scale powering Fabric platform
- Self-improving memory that tracks relationships and resolves contradictions
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | 29 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 11 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 32 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 0 | 122 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Lusor More alternatives to Exabase