Lium vs Zarx
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Lium compared with Zarx
| Detail | 
Lium | 
Zarx |
|---|
| What it does | Agent-first GPU compute marketplace with per-second billing
| EU-resident inference API for open-weight language models
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| MVP
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | KN
| ES
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Paid
| Contact for pricing
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Per-second billing with no minimum
- Agent skill for AI coding agents
- Prepaid balance with card or crypto payment
- 94 GPU models from data center to consumer class
- Provider-set pricing with 95% provider share
- Public price feeds and API access
- Model Context Protocol server for AI documentation search
| - OpenAI-compatible Responses and Chat Completions endpoints
- Streaming with Server-Sent Events
- Function calling and tool use
- Structured JSON output with schema validation
- Audio transcription with file and live WebSocket modes
- Text-to-speech with built-in and customizable voices
- Speech-to-speech translation
- Time series forecasting up to 1,000 periods
- Per-key usage tracking and limits
- Servers owned and operated by NPAW in EU
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Agent-first design with one-command GPU provisioning
- Providers set own prices on open marketplace
- No minimum rental period or reservation required
- Crypto payment option with 2.5% bonus
| - Data residency in EU with no US sub-processor in the data path
- OpenAI-compatible API so teams can keep existing integrations
- Three capability levels—Z Ultra, Z Pro, Z Fast—on the same API
- Operated by NPAW, which has run its own data infrastructure since 2008
- ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001 and ENS High certified
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 44 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 5 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 27 | 13 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 372 | 1 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Lium More alternatives to Zarx