Lium vs Compute Cheap

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Lium compared with Compute Cheap
Detail	Lium	Compute Cheap
What it does	Agent-first GPU compute marketplace with per-second billing	Prepaid interruptible H100, H200, and B300 GPU-hours at the lowest prices
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	KN	US
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Pricing	Not given	H100 SXM 80GB: $1.38/GPU-hour; H200 SXM 141GB: $1.67/GPU-hour; B300 SXM 288GB: $3.49/GPU-hour. Minimum reservation: 2,000 GPU-hours. 50% deposit required after availability confirmation, remaining 50% billed as usage completes.
Key features	Per-second billing with no minimum Agent skill for AI coding agents Prepaid balance with card or crypto payment 94 GPU models from data center to consumer class Provider-set pricing with 95% provider share Public price feeds and API access Model Context Protocol server for AI documentation search	H100, H200, and B300 GPU availability Interruptible (preemptible) GPU capacity 50% deposit payment model Flexible launch sizes (1, 2, 4, or 8 GPUs) Availability confirmation before payment United States and European Union regions Public Pricing API No platform fee layered on top Minimum 2,000 GPU-hours per request
What makes it different	Agent-first design with one-command GPU provisioning Providers set own prices on open marketplace No minimum rental period or reservation required Crypto payment option with 2.5% bonus	Radically lower prices than major cloud providers Request-based model with capacity confirmation Competition and distributed supply model No promotional pricing, available capacity
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	44 +1 (up) since last check	8 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	9	5
Citation Flow (Majestic)	27	32
Referring domains (Majestic)	372	134

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Lium More alternatives to Compute Cheap