LaCrew vs Port of Context

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

LaCrew compared with Port of Context
Detail	LaCrew	Port of Context
What it does	Spend controls, budgets and approvals for AI agents	Context layer platform for regulated industries
Stage	MVP	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Pricing	Free plan: $0 during early access with 2 seats and 3 agents. Planned paid plans: Builder at $49/month with 5 seats and 25 agents; Scale at $199/month with 25 seats and 250 agents. Self-hosting is free.	Free: $0, includes up to 5 members, 100 context nodes, and 100 MB of indexed content. Team: $25 per seat per month (or $200 per seat billed annually), includes up to 25 members, 1,000 context nodes, and 1 GB of indexed content. Enterprise: custom pricing, includes Forward Deployed Engineers, Hybrid
Key features	Onchain allowances and epoch budgets Escalation through reporting tree Session keys with automatic expiration Constitutional governance with veto windows Declared flows and human gates Slack and Telegram supervision Visual org builder and workspace Apache-2.0 open source contracts and SDK Inference budgets for model and API calls Integration with Coinbase AgentKit and Safe	Model-agnostic: runs on Claude, GPT, Gemini, or open-weight models Full observability: trace every tool call, retrieval, and reasoning step Isolated execution: tool calls run in isolated environments by default Code mode: reduces token usage to one-third of traditional approaches Self-hosted on your infrastructure: cloud, on-prem, or air-gapped MCP server integration: works with existing MCP servers unchanged Open source under MIT license Automatic model failover and switching
What makes it different	Bounded blast radius: compromised agents can only spend remaining epoch allowance on whitelisted targets Passkey root stays on user's device; cloud holds only scoped, expiring session keys Fully self-hostable open protocol with Apache-2.0 licensing Approval workflows follow real organizational structure, not smart contract code No token or cryptocurrency knowledge required to use the cloud platform	Isolated by default with no direct system access Reduces token usage to approximately one-third Runs end-to-end air-gapped with no external network calls Full transparency through open agent-observability spec (AVP) No vendor lock-in: switch models without rewriting agents
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	Not checked yet no change since last check	38 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	0	14
Citation Flow (Majestic)	0	28
Referring domains (Majestic)	0	102

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to LaCrew More alternatives to Port of Context