A Claude Desktop extension and plugin that convenes a council with ChatGPT and Gemini for independent AI positions, votes, and recorded dissent
Continuous improvement software for AI agents
Stage
Not given
Not given
Founded
Not given
Not given
Based in
DE
IT
Pricing model
Paid
Not given
Pricing
One-time purchase for Claude Desktop and Claude Code. Usage costs paid directly to OpenAI and Google: $0.02–$0.15 per council decision depending on effort tier and input size; image generation $0.05–$0.20 per call.
Not given
Key features
Three independent AI positions on questions
Majority voting with dissent recorded
Budget guard with daily spending limit
Integrates ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude
Runs on Claude Desktop (macOS, Windows) and Claude Code
Uses own API keys with secure OS storage
Nine specialized tools for different decision types
Two-round cap and domain tie-break for consensus
Failure handling and 345 tests
Plain-language interface requiring no developer skills
Detect and score reliability of AI agent runs
Route weak runs to subject matter experts
Expert review and validation workflow
Write validated fixes into governed memory
Microsoft 365 and Azure integration
Support for multiple agent frameworks
Agentic Context Engineering (ACE) framework
Deployment as SaaS, private cloud, or on-premise
Knowledge builder and governed memory ingestion
SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, ISO 27001, and ISO 9001 compliant
What makes it different
Three independent AI models vote together with dissent kept on record, avoiding single-model bias
Budget guard prevents runaway bills with daily ceiling and worst-case cost reserving
Uses your own API keys stored securely locally, no server or data transmission
One-time purchase model with no subscription or ongoing fees
Works directly in Claude without developer skills
Continuous improvement without model retraining
Captures and reuses expert knowledge as governed memory
Enterprise-grade security and compliance
Works with existing AI systems without replacement
Human-in-the-loop validation for every critical decision