Kirat vs Acenta
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | A Claude Desktop extension and plugin that convenes a council with ChatGPT and Gemini for independent AI positions, votes, and recorded dissent | Secure managed AI agent with models, browser, tools, and persistent files in one Agent Box |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | DE | Not given |
| Pricing model | Paid | Freemium |
| Pricing | One-time purchase for Claude Desktop and Claude Code. Usage costs paid directly to OpenAI and Google: $0.02–$0.15 per council decision depending on effort tier and input size; image generation $0.05–$0.20 per call. | Bring your own agent: $15/month per Agent Box. Standard: $29/month per Agent Box with 130M model tokens per month. Smart: $49/month per Agent Box with 130M model tokens per month. All monthly plans include 7-day free trial. Pay by usage option available at $0.30 per 1M tokens on Standard or $0.75 on |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 12 +10 (up) since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 1 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 3 | 0 |
5 details filled in for both companies.