jilebi vs Zarx
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
jilebi compared with Zarx
| Detail | 
jilebi | 
Zarx |
|---|
| What it does | Linux machines in the cloud for AI agents
| EU-resident inference API for open-weight language models
|
|---|
| Stage | Startup
| MVP
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| ES
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Paid
| Contact for pricing
|
|---|
| Pricing | CPU: $0.009/vCPU·hr, Memory: $0.009/GB·hr, Disk: $0.0001/GB·hr. Stopped machines cost $0.0001/GB·hr.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Launch machines in seconds
- Auto-sleep when not in use
- Wake up in milliseconds
- Dedicated CPU, memory and disk per instance
- Clone machines with same setup
- Automatic routing without IP configuration
- Standard tools support (docker, ssh)
- Share routes with selective access
| - OpenAI-compatible Responses and Chat Completions endpoints
- Streaming with Server-Sent Events
- Function calling and tool use
- Structured JSON output with schema validation
- Audio transcription with file and live WebSocket modes
- Text-to-speech with built-in and customizable voices
- Speech-to-speech translation
- Time series forecasting up to 1,000 periods
- Per-key usage tracking and limits
- Servers owned and operated by NPAW in EU
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Machines wake in milliseconds
- No special CLI required
- Fully isolated virtual sandbox for each machine
- No credit card required to start
| - Data residency in EU with no US sub-processor in the data path
- OpenAI-compatible API so teams can keep existing integrations
- Three capability levels—Z Ultra, Z Pro, Z Fast—on the same API
- Operated by NPAW, which has run its own data infrastructure since 2008
- ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001 and ENS High certified
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | 5 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 13 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 10 | 1 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to jilebi More alternatives to Zarx