Jev vs runx
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Jev compared with runx
| Detail |
Jev |
runx |
| What it does | API access without the waitlist: one key, two endpoints
| Give your agent specialist skills for the work around your product
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Custom criteria: POST state with choice options and score rubrics
- Eight pre-measured rulesets: support-ticket-triage, llm-model-routing, agent-tool-selection, content-moderation, phishing-detection, rag-reranking, agent-output-guardrails, lead-scoring
- Probability distributions over all choices and scores
- Parallel question evaluation within one call
- Key rotation and deletion
- TypeSafe key support for direct billing
| - Pre-built skills for business ops, organic growth, research and development
- Compose skills into repeatable workflows
- Signed receipts recording each run
- Run locally without account via open-source CLI
- Secure credential management through connectors
- Approval gates for spending and publishing actions
- Integration with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and other agents
- Connect to GitHub, Slack, Apollo, Linear, Notion, Sentry and more
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No waitlist: get a key immediately with email or Google sign-in
- Measured pricing: real calls cost ~20× less than vendor-circulated figures
- Input-only pricing with no output tokens
- Eight rulesets with published exact calls and measured output
- Transparent cost reporting with versioned model IDs in responses
| - Runs skills locally on your machine via open-source CLI without requiring an account
- Keeps credentials secure in connectors so they never appear in skills or receipts
- Records every action in a signed receipt for full audit trail
- Write and combine your own skills into custom workflows
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 26 ▼ −1 (down) since last check | 17 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 18 | 10 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 24 | 29 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 80 | 68 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Jev More alternatives to runx