INFLU vs Figwise
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | INFLU | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Write in your voice, not like ChatGPT | AI Scientific Figure Generator for Papers |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Not given | Freemium |
| Pricing | Three subscription tiers: Start at $19/month for one author with ~55 posts/month, Pro at $49/month for multiple platforms with ~145 posts/month, and Agency at $99/month for teams with ~300 posts/month. | Monthly subscription: Starter $15/mo ($12/mo yearly, save 20%) with 20,400 annual credits (~680 AI figures at $0.21 each); Pro $29/mo ($23/mo yearly, save 21%) with 50,400 annual credits (~1680 AI figures at $0.16 each); Max $59/mo ($45/mo yearly, save 24%) with 126,000 annual credits (~4200 AI figu |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 11 −1 (down) since last check | 3 +1 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 4 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 28 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 10 | 38 |
4 details filled in for both companies.