iLang Inc. vs Harny
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
iLang Inc. compared with Harny
| Detail | 
iLang Inc. | 
Harny |
|---|
| What it does | The native language of AI; in human terms, a protocol.
| Agent harness infrastructure that gives AI agents memory for each user, connected accounts, action limits and an audit record.
|
|---|
| Stage | Startup
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | 2026
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | CA
| CA
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Open source
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Free: first 500 monthly-active end users per month, free forever. Paid: $0.30 per monthly-active end user above 500, billed monthly.
|
|---|
| Key features | - AI-native communication protocol with 88 verbs and two syntaxes
- AI See: give any AI model vision by pasting i.ilang.ai URLs
- Zero installation required, pure text format
- Works across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen and other models
- Loader available via pip and npm for automatic protocol injection
- Prompt compression: 67% reduction in tokens for typical instructions
| - Timestamped memory ingestion with backdating capability
- Per-user data isolation and privacy scoping
- Ranked memory recall with dated evidence
- Connected accounts integration per user
- Long-running agent jobs with folder-level operations
- Configurable token ceiling per API call
- Enforced action limits on agent operations
- Complete action audit trail with hash chaining
- MCP server integration for Claude and other clients
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - First protocol to formally map Greek mathematical symbols as primitive verbs for AI-to-AI communication
- Computable vector space for AI judgment using 11 dimensions and fuzzy mathematics instead of binary classification
- Open source and MIT licensed with no royalties or approval required
- Operates at the instruction and behavioral layer, complementary to MCP and A2A protocols
- Tested and benchmarked with public conformance results and DOI-registered research
| - Highest published BEAM benchmark score at 128K tokens: 85.1, compared to competing memory systems
- 98% fewer tokens required than raw tool output, making responses 4× cheaper
- Works with 20+ agent frameworks including LangChain, LangGraph and LlamaIndex
- First 500 monthly-active end users free forever
- Per-person billing model scales with user growth, not API calls
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 38 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 7 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 27 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 66 | 1 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to iLang Inc. More alternatives to Harny